|
Principles of Fundamentals &
Technique
It is important to distinguish between fundamentals
and technique. "Fundamental" means
essential. The Fundamentals of shooting are: 1) Locate
the target (visually, or with the force). 2) Aim or
point the gun at the target. 3) Hold the gun in this
spot or area until the gun fires and the bullet has
left the barrel. The physical description of the body’s
movements we use to execute the fundamentals comprise
our Techniques. The varieties of individual techniques
are endless, and vary according to the tendencies,
preferences, and physical construction of the person.
The various techniques that comprise the stance
should, logically, enable us to best accomplish these
fundamentals under the widest variety of conditions,
both mental and physical.
I’ll begin by defining the principles of the
stance, and then discuss the importance of correct
technique.
To better understand the totality of our stance, it
helps to divide the body into two sections. Let’s
call the lower body, the waist and below, the
"Base," and the upper body the
"Index."
Basically, the function of the Base in high-speed
shooting is to provide a forward stability to the
Index. Within reason, it doesn’t matter what the
Base is doing while the Index is shooting. Ideally,
you should be able to maintain your Index on the
target no matter what your feet are doing.
The principles of the Index are:
1) The shoulders should be square, or at least
fairly square to the target.
2) Both arms should be fairly straight without
either extending or contracting the arms or elbows
unnaturally.
3) The grip, with each hand, should be as high on
the pistol as possible. (There are many subtleties of
the grip, however, since this is a stance/index
discussion, we won’t go there here.)
4) The head should be fairly straight up, without
excessive tilting, and the shooting eye should be
looking as squarely as possible out of the socket.
5) This is paramount: Once this position is
assumed, your entire upper body, including the head,
arms, and grip—your Index—should never change in
relationship to each other.
To nutshell it, the entire upper body is square to,
and pointing at the target, while the Base is
providing an aggressive forward lean or balance for
the Index. Think of your upper body as a non-moveable,
locked together unit, which pivots from the waist.
A few subtleties on the above: Your arms should
have the feeling of "pushing through" the
last few inches of their extension. To get the feeling
of this, assume your stance (you don’t need your
pistol) with your arms not quite fully extended with
the front of your grip touching a wall. Push forward
on the wall as if you were trying to firmly push
through it. This is the feeling of "extending
without locking."
For a discussion on grip, and the 60/40 grip
strength theory, check this post on my Forum Board.
The purpose of the Index is, without the burden and
confusion produced by thinking, to quickly and
consistently hit a target(s). The more variables you
introduce into your Index, i.e., one arm excessively
bent more than the other, one hand pushing or pulling
more than the other, the less chance you have of
reproducing a reliable platform to shoot from under a
wide variety of conditions—especially under stress.
This is why the Index, as currently used in
competition, has evolved to its present state. Any
unnaturally excessive Index, such as the Weaver, etc.,
will be more difficult to reproduce from day to day,
from stage to stage, or just from moment to moment
because our mental state and resulting muscle tension
is in a constant stare of flux.
Your Index is the most important aspect of your
overall stance. The more consistent your Index, the
better you will shoot (execute the fundamentals)—every
time the demand arises. In the early years, as we
experimented with various techniques, we found our
consistency improved as we eliminated the variables
introduced by pushing and pulling, straining and
struggling. Sound principles of technique consistently
control the pistol more effectively than muscle
tension.
Top competitors use the current Index because
results are their primary concern—technique is
secondary, and is a by-product of the intention to
perform the fundamentals effectively under stress.
First see what is important (consistently hitting the
target), and then see what you need to do to get
there. This is called—not starting from a
conclusion.
When I began shooting IPSC in the late 70’s, I
used the Weaver/Chapman stance because I was told that
was how you control the recoil of a .45 ACP — you
know, the man’s gun. Some years later, after
experimenting and altering my Index, I was shooting a
Bill Drill (6 shots into the A zone of an IPSC target
at 7 yds in under 2 seconds) with a single stack .45
with 230g, 190 power factor loads. (I was practicing
for the SOF match.) A local shooter was watching as I
shot a 1.8 something run from the modern or
"modified" Isosceles position. I remember
him commenting, "Wow, I guess your technique
doesn’t require wimp loads to be effective."
This is a common misconception; he was starting to get
the picture.
I consider Rob Leatham to be the greatest
"instinctual" shooter on the planet with an
iron-sighted pistol. Time and time again, I’ve seen
him acquire and shoot targets so quickly it leaves you
speechless. I questioned him on his approach.
Basically, he said: Upper body (shoulders) square to
the target, arms fully extended but not locked, and
most importantly, once in position, the head, arms,
and body move as a unit. He commented that he would
not hesitate to adjust his feet while shooting if that
will preserve the integrity of his Index. He also
said, and I agree, "Why ‘aim’ if your
position can do that for you"? This should not be
taken to mean that he doesn’t aim when he needs to;
it’s just that with proper technique, the gun points
and shoots wherever you look.
Investigate the stability of your current platform.
Assume your Index and then introduce variables such
as: Pulling back with one hand and not the other,
pushing out with one hand and not the other, bending
one elbow slightly and not the other, or bending both
elbows the same amount. You’ll find, the more your
position varies from the above outline, the more your
pistol’s point of aim will change as you slightly
alter small components of your Index.
Brian Enos
USPSA #: A387
|